If you will open your Bibles to the book of 1 Peter, our text for today will be 1 Peter chapter 3 starting in verse 18 and going all the way to chapter 4 verse 2.
! There are at least three theological landmines in this text. It's a really complicated text. I really enjoyed studying it. I've studied it for several weeks now.
But there are multiple pathways that things could go wrong in a hurry. We have Christ preaching to spirits in prison. We have the phrase in this passage that baptism saves. And we have the phrase that whoever has suffered in the flesh is done with sinning.
Lots of complicated, potentially problematic statements in this passage. I think if you've made the wrong turn on any one of them, you would start a cult.
So I'm hoping not to do that today. That's my main goal today, is not to accidentally start a cult.
Because this passage is complicated and the exegesis of this passage is a little bit tricky, I want to go ahead and give you the thesis of what I think Peter's trying to say and also the application points.
I want to front load the sermon with those things and then show you my work as we work our way through the text.
I think that the thesis of 1 Peter in general is that we are not called to fight like the world.
We are in a fight with the world, but we are called not to fight like the world, rather to fight like Jesus.
And the main supporting argument that Peter uses throughout this epistle to support this idea of not fighting like the world is, he says, repeatedly in different ways that we are to look to Jesus and look how he fought and look how it worked out for Jesus pretty well.
And I think that sort of the last statement in the sort of overarching thesis would be something like this.
Pain that is faithfully endured can and will be hyperproductive.
Pain that is faithfully endured can and will be hyperproductive.
I believe there should be a Christian posture toward pain in general that is hopeful, that has expectation and faith, is not avoidant,
but sees pain almost as a pump that God uses to move some of his most treasured treasures into our lives.
I was thinking about the pump jacks that you see, you know, sometimes out in Kansas and Oklahoma and so forth.
And just thought about what it would be like to be, you know, a relatively poor guy living on a little bit of land.
I'm not going to recreate the Beverly Hillbillies story arc here, but it's going to sound like it.
You know, you're living on some rough land.
It's barely producing a crop.
And then someday, one day, you see a little bubble and crude come out of the ground.
And you're living in this, you know, this plywood house.
The wind cuts right through.
It's dusty everywhere.
You have really worked so hard to make a living on this little piece of ground.
And you one day see a little bubble and crude coming up out of the ground.
And so, unfortunately, it's right next to your house.
And so, the problem is as follows.
You do not have any money to move.
You have wealth in concept.
You don't actually have any of it yet.
And it's going to be a while before you do.
You've got to invest in the pump and so on and so forth.
And so, there's this season where this pump is right next to your house.
And it's annoying.
And you really don't have anything to show for it.
And all you hear throughout the day is chun-chun, chun-chun, chun-chun.
Day after day, you just hear this.
But you process that differently because you know, as we saw lightly in 2 Corinthians 4 already,
that these light and momentary troubles are producing for us an eternal weight.
Intentional oil joke there.
Crude weight of glory.
And so, you like deal with the pump in a very different way than someone who doesn't understand the economics at play.
It is still annoying.
It is still a problem.
You don't want to be there.
But you are there.
And you know that while you're there, productivity is happening.
And that one day, you'll get to the point where you're not living next to the pump anymore.
But all of the benefits of the pump will be your kind of life.
So there really needs to, we need to embrace.
And I think that parents, we have to make a massive course correction.
I think that previous generations were not raised with a Christian view of pain.
I think there have been many Christians who have tried to live the Christian life with a worldly view of pain.
They're avoidant of it.
They're afraid of it.
And it's just not going to work.
It's not the Christian perspective.
6 · Returns to thesis statement with added clarity about Peter's argument: fighting like Christ rather than the world makes pain productive
So I think that Paul's, Peter's thesis is something like, when you are in a hard time, fight like Christ.
Don't fight like the world.
And if you fight like Christ, you will see that your pain is productive, just as Christ's pain is so productive.
7 · Introduces the first of three application points, delivered as direct instruction
And I think that there's three application points underneath that thesis.
Number one.
Application number one.
And I'll support these as we move on.
Comfort zone living is costing you character.
Comfort zone living is costing your character.
You have to have a Christian view of pain that doesn't cause you to be consistently avoidant of it.
Because if you are consistently avoiding discomfort, your character will suffer.
Building a life to avoid pain is antithetical to God-honoring productivity.
Building a life to avoid pain is antithetical to God-honoring productivity.
8 · The second application narrows to gospel proclamation specifically
Application number two.
The pain that comes as a consequence of proclaiming the gospel is massively productive and should not be avoided.
Do you hear me?
The pain that comes from sharing the gospel, from being rejected, from being thought of as weird,
from being excluded, from feeling insufficient.
With a Christian view of pain, that pain is massively productive and should not be avoided.
When we avoid it, we are really taxing both our character and our legacy.
We are limiting our productivity in this life, and we are also limiting the development of our own character.
9 · The third application makes a crucial distinction: suffering for Christ (cause) vs
Number three, third application.
Even when you are not suffering for Christ, you must always aim to suffer like Christ.
In other words, there's different kinds of suffering.
And Peter discusses a number of them.
One being, you are suffering because of Christ.
What he's, it's interesting that he does this, he doesn't assume that just because a person is suffering for Christ,
that they will suffer like Christ.
He says, hey, you know, yeah, you're being picked on.
The world's not liking you.
Jesus said this would happen.
They're rejecting you.
There'll still be a temptation for you to respond to this suffering like the world responds.
So there's a difference between suffering for Christ and suffering like Christ.
First Peter is mostly a book about however, whatever suffering comes your way, you should always suffer like Christ.
Even if that suffering is physical, has anything to do with persecution, or even as a consequence of your own sins,
whatever the cause of your suffering, whether it's suffering, whether it's for Christ or not,
we need to ensure that we're always suffering like Christ.
That we have a Christ-like attitude in our suffering, wherever that suffering comes from.
10 · Signals the shift from front-loaded conclusions to textual demonstration
Okay, so let me kind of support the thesis and the application points by showing you, walking you through the text.
11 · Identifies 1 Peter 4:1 as the grounding verse for the entire passage and reads it twice for emphasis
I think that verse 1 of chapter 4 is probably the verse that grounds the entire passage and helps us to see clearly Peter's intent.
Verse 1, 1 Peter chapter 4 says this,
Since therefore Christ suffered in the flesh, arm yourselves with the same way of thinking.
Since therefore Christ suffered in the flesh, arm yourselves with the same way of thinking.
12 · Exegetes the phrase 'way of thinking' by distinguishing disposition from mere doctrine or attitude
The way of thinking is a really interesting term.
I think that very often Christians sometimes believe that if they just get the right doctrine, that that's the goal.
It's the accumulation of right beliefs.
It's like, no, we are actually looking for the right disposition.
Not just the right doctrine, but the right disposition.
The phrase, the way of thinking, is it relies on a very unique Greek word that doesn't simply mean ideas or mind or even attitude.
It's something even deeper than that.
It's the idea of disposition.
It's like who you naturally are in reaction to your environment.
13 · Introduces the fight/flight/freeze framework from stress research to make the concept of disposition observable and familiar
If you think about it this way, there was the famous study that said, you know,
that people respond in one of three ways to stress.
This started in the early 1900s into attacks, rather.
And the first were fight or flight.
You guys have probably heard that many times.
And then a third was added, which I think is totally reasonable and observable, and that is freeze.
So there's three possible ways that people respond to things.
And it tends to scary things, to pain, to the potential of pain.
Fight, flight, or freeze.
And that's a disposition.
Like, there are some people that do it this way.
There are some people that do it that way.
14 · Completes the fight/flight/freeze framework by adding the fourth way: faith
And what Peter is saying here is, is that you should arm yourself with the fourth way, which is faith.
There's a fourth option to difficult circumstances.
There's a fourth option to the things that are frightening, as Peter just got done talking about earlier in chapter 3.
And that is faith.
Respond like Christ did.
Arm yourself, he says.
The phrase arm yourself, that's a term for combat or for war.
This, your disposition, whether you realize it or not, is your weapon.
It's the thing you reach for instinctively to handle hard things.
And Peter is calling us to arm ourselves, not with one of the three worldly dispositions or human dispositions,
but to arm ourselves with the disposition of Jesus Christ.
How he fought, how he endured suffering, his attitude toward pain.
That's the disposition that the Christian should have.
15 · Names Walter Cannon and uses the martyrs as historical evidence of the fourth way
Walter Cannon, in this initial idea of fight or flight and then eventually freeze,
I want to say, yeah, there is a fourth way.
We see it in Jesus and we see it in the martyrs.
What are the martyrs doing exactly when they die the way they do?
Are they fighting?
Kind of.
Are they freezing?
Kind of.
There's something going on here that doesn't fit any of the three normal categories
when a faithful person faces persecution.
And the answer is, is that they have armed themselves
with the disposition that Christ has toward pain, toward suffering.
It's a fourth way.
It's the way of faith.
Arming ourselves with this way of faith is rooted in the fact that Christ has already showed us
the productive pathway, the productive response to pain.
Look back at verse one again.
Since, therefore, Christ suffered in the flesh.
Since, therefore, Christ suffered in the flesh,
arm yourself, therefore, with this way of thinking.
We have a path cleared out by Jesus that shows us the right way,
the most productive way to respond to pain.
And now we have to, as Peter's telling us in verse one,
arm ourselves with this new disposition.
Put on this new disposition.
16 · The transition word 'therefore' in the text becomes the transition in the sermon—signaling backward movement to support the forward claim
Now, the word, therefore, in verse one tells us that we do need to spend a little time looking backwards
because Peter's referencing some stuff that's already happened
and some stuff that he's already said.
And you can kind of see where we're supposed to look.
If you look at verse 18, you see that there he is also talking about the sufferings of Christ.
17 · Reads the entire passage (1 Peter 3:18-22) aloud without commentary, allowing the congregation to hear its complexity and density
Verse 18 of chapter three.
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous,
that he might bring us to God and being put to death in the flesh,
but being but made alive in the spirit in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison
because they formerly did not obey when God's patience waited in the days of Noah
while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight persons,
were brought safely through water.
For baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you,
not as a removal of dirt from the body, but as an appeal to God for a good conscience,
through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven
and is at the right hand of God with angels, authorities, and powers,
having been subjected to him.
18 · Validates the congregation's potential confusion and models intellectual humility
If you ever read the Bible and just feel like,
I'm a dumb person.
I don't understand what's going on.
That's sometimes the absolute right reaction to reading the Bible.
This is one of those places where it is,
okay, you just said a bunch of things, Peter.
I'm going to have to really think about what you're trying to tell me.
There's a lot going on in this particular section,
so let's see if we can unpack some of what he's doing.
19 · Teaches hermeneutical method: canonical interpretation using clearer passages to illumine difficult ones
By the way, the way that I always tend to try to figure things out
is I look in the rest of the book and say,
well, what else is he saying similar to this?
But I think the big key to understanding the Bible, frankly,
is that ultimately there really is only one author of the whole book,
the whole Bible.
One author through many different personalities,
but one author making one point through many different places
and personalities to different people.
And so one of the things that I rely on a ton when I get to these passages
is I just ask, well, what does God mostly like to talk about?
And how does God talk in other places?
And I sort of use the other passages that are clearer
as a kind of Rosetta Stone to understand this particular passage.
That's why I'm fairly confident that I won't start a cult today.
Because everything I'm seeing in this passage,
I can see much more clearly in some other passage.
20 · Identifies Peter's controlling pattern across 1 Peter: sufferings followed by subsequent glories
So let me try to walk you through what I think he's saying here.
I think one thing to acknowledge is that Peter just has this consistent pattern
throughout the entire book that we could summarize
in a statement he makes early on in chapter 1,
where he uses the phrase,
the sufferings of Christ and his subsequent glories.
I think that phrase,
sufferings and subsequent glories,
is the way that Peter wants us to think about pain.
It's a pump.
It's an annoyance.
It's a hardship.
But it's producing for us an eternal weight of glory.
And he grounds that in Jesus,
who suffered and then experienced subsequent glories.
21 · Multiplies examples of the suffering-to-glory pattern across 1 Peter with rapid-fire citations
In verse 21, he does the same thing in chapter 1.
He says,
God who raised him from the dead and gave him glory.
I think the main sort of axiom,
the main machine, if you will,
in Peter, it's a pump.
It goes down and up.
It goes in and out.
It produces by declining to some degree.
There's this idea of the seed falling to the ground and dying.
That's what Peter's doing.
He's just using different terminology.
He says,
after you have suffered a little while,
later on,
God will himself confirm,
restore,
restore,
confirm,
strengthen,
and establish you.
He says,
humble yourself under the mighty hand of the Lord,
so that in due time,
he will exalt you.
And so,
this is why I say that Christians ought to have a different attitude toward pain.
Because we actually believe it produces something.
We believe it produces a lot of things, actually.
22 · Synthesizes the exegetical work into a clear claim structure: Peter is proving pain's hyperproductivity by pointing to Jesus' suffering and its results
So,
one of the things Peter's clearly doing is,
is he's pointing us back to Jesus,
so that we see just the classic seed narrative,
the seed story arc,
the falling down,
the being result,
the resultant exaltation,
and fruitfulness,
and so forth.
And I think the big idea is,
is that when you faithfully endure pain,
that pain produces far more
than you could have ever asked or imagined.
And I think what Peter's doing mostly in this passage,
is he's giving us two proofs,
that pain can be hyperproductive.
He points to Jesus and says,
look,
here's someone who endured suffering faithfully.
And look what God produced,
as a result of this faithful suffering.
23 · Announces the two-product structure explicitly and invites the congregation to discover it themselves by reading the text again
And I think he's saying,
there's two things,
that Jesus' suffering,
was used by God to produce.
Let's look back at verse 18 again.
I'm saying there's two things in this passage,
that Peter's saying,
look what God used,
look how God used Jesus' pain.
Look what,
look what was produced,
as a consequence of Jesus' faithful endurance.
Let's read this again.
You tell me if you can see,
two things here.
24 · Re-reads 1 Peter 3:18-22 in full a second time, now with the two-product framework in mind
Verse 18,
1 Peter 3,
For Christ also suffered once for sins,
the righteous for the unrighteous,
that he might bring us to God,
being put to death in the flesh,
but being made alive in the spirit,
in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison,
because they formerly did not obey.
When God's patience waited in the days of Noah,
while the ark was being prepared,
in which a few,
that is eight persons,
were brought safely through the water,
baptism,
which corresponds to this,
now saves you,
not as a removal of dirt from the body,
but as an appeal to God for a good conscience,
through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,
who has gone into heaven,
and is at the right hand of God,
with angels, authorities, powers,
having been subjected to him.
25 · Identifies the first product of Jesus' suffering: our redemption
What did Jesus' pain produce?
Well, first of all,
it produced our redemption.
Do you see that in the passage?
Jesus' pain produced our salvation.
Verse 18,
For Christ also suffered for sins,
the righteous for the unrighteous,
that he might bring us back to God.
26 · Demonstrates that Peter has already made this move in chapter 2—pointing to Christ's suffering as both example and atonement
Peter has run this exact play before,
earlier in chapter 2.
He's talking to servants who are suffering
under unjust masters,
and in verse 21 he says this,
listen, he's calling these servants to suffer well,
to suffer like Christ,
and listen to what he says,
For to this you have been called,
because Christ also suffered for you,
leaving you an example,
so that you might follow in his steps.
He committed no sin,
neither was deceit found in his mouth.
When he was reviled,
he did not revile in return.
When he suffered,
he did not threaten,
but continued entrusting himself
to him who judges justly.
He himself bore our sins in his body
on the tree,
that we might die to sin
and live to righteousness.
By his wounds you have been healed,
for you were straying like sheep,
but have now returned to the shepherd
and overseer of your souls.
27 · Makes Peter's rhetorical strategy explicit: you are exhibit A for pain's productivity
So do you get the play that Peter's running?
Here, and in chapter 3,
he's saying,
Endure suffering like Jesus.
If you endure suffering like Jesus,
there will be all sorts of things produced.
And here's exhibit 1.
What did God produce
with the sufferings of Jesus?
You!
He produced you
in your current justified, adopted state.
He's saying,
You want evidence?
Do you want evidence
that God turns pain
into something productive
if you will endure in faith?
You are that evidence.
He died for you
to return you back to God.
You were like sheep straying,
and now he has returned you
to the shepherd of your souls.
That's an incredible sort of way
of saying,
Here's,
You want some proof?
You want some proof
that the pain is productive?
You're the proof.
28 · Creates an analogy to make the absurdity of Christian doubt about pain's productivity vivid
Friends,
I want you to lock this saying in
and really think about it
in terms of how your attitude
toward pain
is reflected in this.
I truly believe
that a Christian
struggling to believe
that pain can be productive
is like an apple
struggling to believe
in apple seeds.
I really think
it's the most insane thing
in the world
that a Christian doubts
whether faithfully endured pain
can be productive
because they themselves
are the evidence
that it can be.
29 · Transitions to the second product of Jesus' suffering: the prison sermon
That's one of the,
I think,
tricks,
tricks,
rhetorical plays
that Peter is running here.
He's saying,
Yeah,
Oh yeah,
it works.
Look,
you,
you exist.
You have been saved.
How did that happen?
Because Jesus didn't fight
like the world.
Jesus entrusted himself
to him
who judges justly.
Also,
Jesus did not fear pain.
Not as a fundamental.
Jesus did not commit
to living in his comfort zone,
did not commit
to a life primarily dictated
by the search
of personal peace
and affluence.
He embraced the Father's will
and he produced something glorious
as a result.
And now,
we get into this next section
where it says in verse 19
that in addition to producing our salvation,
it produced a prison sermon.
It produced a prison sermon.
Do you see that?
Verse 18 and 19,
For Christ also suffered
once for sins,
the righteous for the unrighteous,
that he might bring us to God,
being put to death in the flesh,
but made alive in the Spirit,
in which he went
and proclaimed to the spirits
in prison
because they formerly
did not obey
when God's patience waited
in the days of Noah
while the ark was being prepared.
30 · Explains the two-brag structure across the New Testament: (1) salvation of sinners, (2) defeat of spiritual powers
Okay.
What's going on here?
What's Jesus doing,
preaching,
and when is Jesus doing it?
What is Jesus doing,
preaching the spirits in prison,
and when is Jesus doing it?
Well,
I think that this is part
of the classic one-two punch
in gospel proclamation
in basically every book
of the New Testament.
And there's basically two ways
that New Testament writers
brag about the cross's consequences.
One, he saved us.
He saved us from our sin.
He died.
He made atonement.
He propitiated God's wrath.
He saved us.
And there's a second brag
that shows up all the time,
and that brag is,
and he subdued all of the principalities
and powers and demons and so forth.
What is the gospel?
What's happening in the gospels?
Just helping a bunch of people out?
Kicking a bunch of demons out.
Like, what's happening in Acts?
Helping a bunch of people out?
Kicking a bunch of demons out.
What is Revelation about?
Nearly every epistle you'll find
has two celebratory exclamations
littered throughout them.
Number one, he died for us
while we did not deserve it.
Number two, he defeated Satan
and all of his enemies.
And so my understanding
of what's happening
in this section of Scripture
from, you know, verse 18 through 22
of chapter 3
is that Peter is going back and forth,
and he's showing the two things
that Christ's cross
have most famously accomplished.
One, salvation,
and two, superiority
over all principalities and powers.
And if that is the correct take,
that would make sense of verse 22.
You see verse 22?
This is a very common way of talking
in the New Testament
about Jesus' cross victory.
Who has gone into heaven
is at the right hand of God
with angels, authorities, and powers
having been subjected to him.
So I think what Peter's doing here
is he's saying the two outcomes
of Christ's cross
that show that pain can be productive
when entrusted to God
are the salvation of souls
and the superiority
over all other beings.
31 · Lays out two interpretive options for the spirits in prison (human spirits vs
Now, this idea of Jesus
going into a prison to preach,
it's like, well, where does that happen?
There are multiple ways
of thinking about this,
multiple theories.
I would tell you that they basically
fall into one of two categories.
Number one, these are spirits
of human beings
who during the time of Noah
did not obey
and were cast into
sort of the outer darkness,
not hell, but shoal
or something like that,
and that Jesus went and preached to them
not a message of salvation,
but a message of condemnation.
You should have listened.
The other option is pretty close.
It's just that they're not human spirits.
They're demons.
Either disembodied
or cast into the gloomy darkness
during the flood
in which Jesus also did the exact same thing.
He went and preached
a message of vindication
of his superiority.
When did he do this?
There's two options.
He did this during the time of Noah
or he did this
after his resurrection
or after his death
or after his resurrection
or something like that.
32 · Establishes the boundaries of legitimate interpretation: this was not a salvation offer (rules out post-mortem evangelism) but a vindication message (Christ's victory proclaimed)
But there's a few things
we can know for sure.
Number one,
this was not a message of salvation.
It would just disagree
with everything else in the Bible
to suggest that Jesus
was going to people
after they had died
or to demons
and offering a message of salvation.
We know that for sure
and we know that
the message of vindication,
I have won,
is indeed something
that God delights in saying
to the principalities,
the powers,
and so on and so forth.
So I think that's what's going on.
I'll try to walk you through this
a little bit more in a minute.
33 · Shifts to the second theological landmine: baptism saves
Now, what about this
baptism saves thing?
In fact, what about,
why is Peter taking us to Noah
in general?
34 · Identifies the hermeneutical move: typology
I want you to think about
three ideas in the Noah typology.
See that phrase in verse 21,
baptism, which corresponds to this,
now saves you,
not as a removal of dirt from the body,
but as an appeal to God
for a good conscience.
That word corresponds
is the word for type.
Peter's doing typology here.
And I think this is
an important lesson
and not just something
kind of
that you might want to know about.
His invocation of Noah here
is really interesting
and using the ark
is really interesting
for at least three reasons.
35 · First typological insight: the floodwaters represent pain/judgment that either destroys or delivers depending on whether you are in the ark (Christ)
Number one,
I think one of the ideas
being communicated here
is that pain can either
be productive or destructive.
Pain can either be
productive or destructive.
If you place your faith in Christ,
the same pain that judges
and destroys the unbeliever
will deliver
and purify the believer.
The floodwaters being God's pain,
God's judgment,
the suffering.
What is suffering?
What do the floodwaters
of suffering
do to the unbelievers
outside the ark?
Destroys them.
What will pain do to you
if Christ doesn't preserve your heart,
fill you full of the Holy Spirit,
and let you persevere in Him
through hope?
It will destroy you.
You will deconstruct.
You will walk away
and you will blame God
because a good God
wouldn't do X, Y, and Z.
When the waters rise,
if you are not truly in Christ,
the suffering,
the hardship,
the calamity,
it will destroy you.
But if you are in Christ,
what do the waters do then?
They transport you
to the mountaintop.
They move you
to the next stage.
They put you
in a unique position
of authority
and leadership.
You see,
the idea is
that the pain
that destroys
can also
save
and secure
and start over
if you are in Christ.
36 · Applies the ark typology directly: Christ is your ark, so arm yourself with his disposition
And so, like,
again,
the big message
of Peter is
if you're going to
suffer anyway,
suffer in Christ.
Christ is seen
as the ark here.
Put your faith in Christ.
Live out your life
in Christ.
Put on the mind
of Christ.
Arm yourself
with the disposition
of Christ.
Make him your ark.
And when the waters
of suffering
and hardship rise,
you will find
not that they destroyed you,
even though there will be
moments where you're
hanging on
and it's really
gusty out there,
you will find
that that same calamity
has brought you
to a place
that you needed
to be,
that was in God's
next step
for you.
That's why the Christian
just has to have
an entirely
different attitude
toward pain.
37 · Third typological insight: baptism represents entrance into Christ (the ark), not a mechanical salvation
And the third idea
is when he says
that baptism
saves,
I think what he's
really saying here
is that baptism
is the ceremonial
entrance into the ark.
It's the thing
that is represented
by baptism,
which is,
I am trusting Christ.
The idea,
I think,
here is you have
entered into Christ
like those eight survivors
entered into the ark,
and because of that
you are saved
from calamity
and the natural
consequences of calamity
and the natural
consequences of pain.
The very thing
that could drive you
away from God,
the very thing
that could make you
angry and bitter
and self-pitying
and full of excuses
and just a victim
will drive you
into obedience,
into faith,
into a higher level
of your walk
with the Lord.
38 · Cites Wayne Grudem to clarify that Peter is not teaching baptismal regeneration but rather that baptism symbolizes the inward reality of faith
Wayne Grudem
talks about this
in his commentary
on this issue.
He says,
Baptism now saves you
not the outward
physical ceremony
of baptism,
but the inward
spiritual reality
which baptism represents.
An appeal to God
for a good conscience,
Grudem says,
is an inward
spiritual transaction
between God
and the individual,
a transaction
symbolized by the
outward ceremony.
39 · Recaps the two-product structure (salvation and demon defeat) and emphasizes its normalcy across the New Testament
So as we're working
through this,
we've said,
okay,
Peter seems to be
doing two things.
He's talking about
our salvation
and he's talking
about demons.
And I want to
help you to see
that that's
extraordinarily normal.
It's just the way
that the New Testament
talks about the victory
of Christ.
It's routine
that we see
this idea
that Jesus'
authority
over the darkness,
over principalities
and powers,
it just shows up
over and over
and over again.
It's in Romans,
it's in 1 Corinthians,
it's in Ephesians,
it's in Philippians,
probably most famously
it's in Colossians.
40 · Cites Colossians 1:16 and 2:15 as clear examples of the two-brag pattern, then applies it to 1 Peter 3:19
For by him
all things were created
in heaven and on earth,
visible and invisible,
whether thrones
or dominions
or rulers
or authorities,
all things were created
through him
and for him.
And then again
in chapter 2,
he disarmed
the rulers
and authorities
and put them
to open shame
by triumphing
over them.
You see this
throughout everywhere
and I think
that's what Jesus
is doing
to the spirits
in prison.
I think he is
on a I told you so
mission
that is a holy
righteous vindication
of his name.
He's displaying
his greatness,
he's making
his enemies
his footstool,
so on and so forth.
41 · Recaps the two evidences (salvation and demon defeat) and announces a third product of suffering to be found in 4:1-2
Now,
those are the two
main evidences
that Peter,
we're almost done,
thank you for your patience,
this is a lot.
Those are the two
main evidences
of
Peter's proof,
his thesis.
Endure pain
like Christ
and it will be productive.
How do you know?
Number one,
he saved you with it.
Number two,
he subdued
all the demons.
And now we're ready
to look at verses
one and two again,
kind of land here
because there seems
to be a third
thing
that Peter says
can be produced
by faithful
suffering.
42 · Reads 1 Peter 4:1-2 and immediately flags the third theological landmine: the claim that suffering ends sin
Since therefore,
look at verse one
of chapter four,
since therefore
Christ suffered
in the flesh,
arm yourselves
with the same way
of thinking,
for whoever has
suffered in the flesh
has ceased from sin
so as to live
for the rest
of the time
in the flesh,
no longer
for human passions
but for the will
of God.
See, this is another
potential cult moment
because we could just
say like,
hey, if we suffer
enough in the flesh,
we won't sin anymore.
By the way,
I have an iron
in a branding fire
outside
and afterward
we'll make our way
outside and,
you know,
there's this
broken,
you know,
flawed,
heretical doctrine
called perfectionism.
It's held by Nazarenes
and other people
and that is
that you arrive
at a certain place
where you no longer sin.
Which is insane
because I know
some Nazarenes
and I love them
but they most definitely
still sin
just like me.
43 · Corrects the perfectionist misreading by locating the verse in a sanctification framework rather than perfectionism
So Peter's not saying
that we can somehow
go through
one hardship,
one significant hardship
and just stop sinning
but he is saying
that that is
the path
to sanctification.
That doing hard things
in the name of the Lord,
insisting
that you follow Jesus
when your flesh
is barking
at you to stop,
that is going to have
an effect
on your relationship
with your flesh
and with sin.
44 · Supports the sanctification reading with James 1:2-4 and Romans 5:3-5, both of which teach that trials produce godly character through faith and the Spirit
We know,
the Bible's clear,
that suffering
produces godliness
in some way
when it is
joined with faith
through the Spirit.
Jared read from James,
consider it all joy,
my brothers,
when you encounter
various trials
for you know
that these trials
are going to produce
things in you.
Steadfastness
will have its full effect
and then you will
be perfect and complete
and lacking in nothing.
Romans 5,
not only that we
rejoice in our sufferings
knowing that suffering
produces endurance
and endurance
produces character
and character
produces hope
and hope does not
put us to shame
because God's love
has been poured
into our hearts
through the Holy Spirit
who has been given to us.
45 · Synthesizes the exegesis into a clear statement of what 1 Peter 4:1-2 means: suffering practices Christ-like disposition, develops spiritual muscles, and changes our relationship with sin
I think what Peter's saying
is similar.
He's saying that a person
who endures suffering
with faith
has in some sense
practiced the disposition
of Christ-like suffering.
He has turned a corner
in terms of
becoming a new person.
He is a person
who has in the hardest
moments of his life
resisted the barking
and yelping of the flesh,
quieted his soul,
entrusted himself
to him who judges justly,
and in that sense
by enduring suffering
he has developed
some of the muscles
that are needed
to say no consistently
to sin and the flesh
and yes consistently
to God.
I think that's what
Peter's saying here.
Not that certain amounts
of suffering
will make you perfect,
but that one of the things,
one of the three things
he's saying
suffering produces
is for us
as sinners
a new relationship
with our flesh
and with the truth.
46 · Makes the transfer principle explicit: trust practiced in gospel-rejection transfers to daily temptation resistance
All of those times
we spent telling ourselves
during those hard moments
when we want to quit,
when we want to hit
the eject button,
all of those hard moments
where we instead
choose to trust,
that trust transfers
into our daily life
and how we approach
just the normal annoyances
of being simple
and the normal temptations
that are accompanied
in this world.
I think the idea
is something like this.
What if you started
sharing the gospel routinely
so that you became
routinely rejected
and ridiculed
and mocked?
Would that help you
with your porn habit?
With your whatever?
Yes.
Yes.
That's the idea.
Yes.
If you will suffer righteously
and develop a Christ-like
relationship to pain,
with pain,
it will produce godliness
in a way that cannot
be produced
in any other
particular way.
47 · Returns to application point one with reinforcement from the exegesis
Which brings us back
to our application.
question.
Number one,
comfort zone living
is costing you
character points.
Comfort zone living
is costing you
character points.
If you have built
a life around
avoiding hard things
because you don't have
a Christian relationship
with pain,
that is affecting
your character.
that is affecting
your ability
to sort of be
who God's called
you to be.
We don't want
to do that.
Building a life
to avoid pain
is antithetical
to God-honoring
productivity.
Pain is actually
a part of the process
that God uses
to produce.
Think of the oil pump.
48 · Returns to application point two, now grounded in Peter's two-product argument
Number two,
gospel suffering,
gospel-related suffering,
is massively productive.
The pain that comes
as a consequence
of proclaiming
the gospel
is good pain.
Productive pain.
It will help you.
You shouldn't avoid it.
You should understand
that this kind
of endurance learned
is exceptionally good
for you.
It's exceptionally good
for the world indeed.
In fact,
that's the whole idea
here is that
when you endure
suffering in faith,
you see other people
blessed.
And you see yourself
blessed.
49 · Returns to application point three with pastoral specificity—not everyone is suffering for Christ, but many are suffering
And number three,
suffer like Christ
even when you are
not suffering
for Christ.
I don't know
how many people
in this room
are suffering
for Christ,
but I know
several people
in this room
are suffering.
And what I would
just encourage you
to see is
that fundamentally,
if you can endure
this season
of suffering
by arming yourself
with Christ's disposition,
which is a hopeful
and trusting disposition
to hardship,
you will see God
use your pain
to produce
all sorts
of excellent glories.
50 · The prayer recapitulates the sermon's themes: God's sovereignty over suffering, Christ's suffering as our start, suffering as productive, and the call to look to Jesus and suffer like him
Let's pray.
Amen.
Father God,
would you,
through your Holy Spirit,
help us
to stop being afraid?
Lord,
we live in a world
perfectly and totally
controlled by our
Father God,
who has already
demonstrated He loves us
and that He gave
His own Son for us.
Lord,
we should just have
a completely different
relationship to suffering
than anybody else
in the world.
It's where we got
our start
in the sufferings
of Christ.
It's why the world
is the way it is
to the extent
that there's anything
good here.
It's because
Christ has shed
His blood
for this world.
It is our freedom
and our joy
and our hope
and, Lord,
it all came about
because someone
did a really hard thing,
the only thing
that He could do
for us,
that no one else
could do.
I think Peter
would have us
look to Jesus,
the author
and perfecter
of our faith,
who for the joy
set before Him
endured the cross,
forsaking its shame.
Lord,
would You please
help us
not only to receive
the comfort
that comes from
the cross,
but also
our marching orders.
Would You please
help us
to suffer
like Jesus Christ?
to see
pain
and difficulty,
especially
gospel-related pain,
to see that
through the eyes
of faith
and hope,
expectation.
Lord,
would You please
through Your Holy Spirit
do this work for us.
In Jesus' name
we pray.
Amen.
51 · The communion invitation reframes the call to take up the cross as investment advice rather than sadism
Well,
for communion,
I just thought
I would share
something real quickly
with you.
Jesus says
to every person
in this room,
if you want
to be His disciple,
you've got to
take up your cross
and follow Him.
And I want to
clear something up
before you come
and celebrate
this reminder
of His cross,
His presence
in this celebration.
Do you think
that Jesus
is calling you
to take up your cross
because He's like
one of these kind
of guys
who suffers
and wants everybody
else to suffer too?
Like,
what is Jesus
actually,
why would Jesus
tell you
to take up
your cross?
Why is He
telling you
to do that?
The answer
is that He
loves you
and there's
certain crowns
that you can
only get
on the other
side of that
cross bearing.
That's the answer.
He loves you.
He's not
doing a hard thing
and like,
well,
you've got to do
a hard thing too
because I'm doing
a hard thing.
No,
He's doing
the hard thing
for the joy
set before Him
and He loves you
and He wants you
to follow Him
so that you find
the glory
after the suffering.
And so this
communion
is an invitation
by Him
not only
to be saved
but to follow
this most excellent
person
to the cross,
to the grave,
out of the grave,
to the throne,
it's the last
thing He prayed
for you.
Did you know
that the last
thing He prayed
for you
was that you
would see
His glory,
that you
would be with
Him where He
is,
that you
would reign
with Him.
Why is He
calling us
to do hard
things,
to endure
hard things,
to suffer?
Because He's
a meanie?
No, He loves
you and He's
giving you
the most excellent
investment advice
ever given
to anybody.
unless a seed
falls to the
ground and
dies, it
remains only
a seed,
but if it
falls to the
ground and
dies, it
produces, it
produces, it
produces, it
produces.
So this
communion is an
invitation for
you to just
have that
conversation with
Jesus and
say, Lord,
I'm not you.
I live under
you, I live
in you, but I
do want to be
like you.
Would you
please give me
the faith to
follow you?
Come and
partake of it.
Come grab the
elements.
Sit down.