What's Wrong With People?
Thesis Human beings are without excuse before God because creation clearly reveals His existence, yet we systematically suppress this knowledge through distorted thinking, corrupted desires, and idolatrous worship—making the righteousness offered in Christ our only hope.
Discuss · apply
6 questions for your group this week
-
Paul says in verse 20 that God's invisible attributes are 'clearly seen' in creation. What does 'clearly seen' mean to you—is Paul saying the knowledge of God is obvious, or that it requires careful study, or something else?Romans 1:20→ Think about your own life: when have you most clearly sensed God's existence or power? Was it through study, or through direct observation of creation?
-
According to verses 21-23, what happens when people know God but don't honor Him as God? What does Paul mean by their 'thinking became futile' and their hearts were 'darkened'?Romans 1:21-23→ Have you noticed this pattern in your own reasoning—where wanting something to be true actually makes you more convinced it is true, even when evidence contradicts it?
-
Paul teaches in verse 25 that people 'exchanged the truth about God for a lie.' What are some examples of lies our culture exchanges the truth for? What makes these lies so attractive?Romans 1:25→ When you notice yourself drawn to one of these cultural lies, what does that reveal about what you're actually worshiping in that moment?
-
In verses 26-27, Paul describes desires that are 'contrary to nature.' He's not primarily condemning people—he's showing that when we suppress knowledge of God, even our deepest desires become unreliable guides. How does this challenge the cultural message that we should always follow our hearts?Romans 1:26-27→ Can you think of a time when trusting your own desires led you somewhere you didn't want to go?
-
Notice in verses 28-32 that Paul doesn't say God actively punishes people—instead, God 'gave them up' to their desires. What does this tell us about how God's judgment actually works? Why might this be more terrifying than active punishment?Romans 1:28-32→ If God's wrath sometimes looks like Him stepping back and letting us experience the consequences of our own choices, how should that shape how we view His patience toward us right now?
-
Paul's purpose in Romans 1:18-32 is not to make us feel superior to 'those sinners out there'—it's to show that all of us are without excuse and desperately need the righteousness offered in Christ (verse 16). How does understanding your own capacity for suppressing God's truth change how you think about your need for the gospel?Romans 1:16-17→ What specific area of your life right now might you be suppressing truth about God—and what would it look like to stop?
5-day reading plan
This week we walk through Paul's diagnosis of human rebellion: from the knowledge of God we suppress, through the corrupted reasoning and desires that follow, to the worship that shapes everything beneath—and finally to the gospel that remains our only escape.
Paul doesn't speculate about what people might know of God. He declares that God's eternal power and divine nature are clearly perceived in the things that have been made. Creation is not ambiguous; it testifies to a Creator with unmistakable clarity. Friends, this means the question 'Does God exist?' was settled the moment you looked at a tree, a star, or your own body—you already know the answer.
Notice Paul's progression: they knew God, but their thoughts became futile—not because they lacked intelligence, but because they refused to honor the One who made everything. A mind built on a lie, no matter how clever its construction, is futile at its root. We exhaust ourselves building systems and philosophies that must, at every turn, explain away the most obvious truth in the universe.
God doesn't stop people from worshiping—He allows them to pursue what they love, and that pursuit becomes their judgment. When we exchange the truth of God for a lie and worship the creature rather than the Creator, our desires become engines of destruction. The culture promises that following your heart will set you free; Paul shows us that a heart turned away from God is precisely what enslaves us.
Paul doesn't list these sins as separate problems; he lists them as a cascade, each flowing into the next. Pride births arrogance; arrogance births foolishness; foolishness births deception; deception births cruelty. We tell ourselves we can contain one sin, manage one rebellion, indulge one compromise—but Paul shows us the arithmetic of our own hearts. Each yes to sin makes the next yes easier and the no harder.
Paul's answer to the diagnosis of Romans 1:18-32 is not self-help or behavioral reform—it is the gospel, the power of God for salvation. The same gospel that rescues the individual from the futility of corrupted reasoning and desires is the only message that addresses the root of what's wrong with people. We are not called to help people think better or feel better; we are called to announce that Christ has made a way back to the God they've been running from.
What We Pretend Not to Know
This card invites your family to notice how we sometimes know things are wrong but convince ourselves otherwise. It's a chance to help kids see that honesty with ourselves—and with God—starts with admitting what we already know deep down. Listen for moments where your kids recognize this pattern in their own lives.
Pastor Ricky talked about how we all know God is real—creation shows us that—but sometimes we pretend we don't know it so we can do what we want. Can you think of a time when you knew something was wrong, but you told yourself it was okay anyway? What made you finally honest about it?
When We Suppress What We Know
- What area of your life did the sermon make you realize you might be suppressing knowledge of God—perhaps in how you think, what you desire, or what you worship?
- Where do you sense that you and I, as a couple, have together constructed reasoning or justified desires that conveniently avoid what we actually know to be true about God?
- How can we pray for each other this week to turn from suppression toward honest acknowledgment of God's reality and His rightful place in our marriage?
Romans 1:20
For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made. So they are without excuse.
Why this verse: This verse is the theological hinge of the entire sermon—it establishes that all people possess clear knowledge of God through creation and therefore cannot claim ignorance as an excuse for their rebellion. Memorizing this verse anchors the listener to Paul's central claim: human suppression of God's truth is willful, not innocent, making the gospel our only hope.
The shape of the argument
33 units across exposition, application, illustration, theological claim, and conclusion. The pastor's argument is built from these moving parts.
- personal story · unit #6 — Alcantar narrates a conversation with his elementary-age son about proving the existence of air despite its invisibility. The child knows air exists through its effects but struggles to articulate proof when his father plays skeptic. The illustration demonstrates how obvious realities can seem impossible to prove when someone adopts a posture of determined unbelief.
- cultural reference · unit #13 — Alcantar uses Woody Allen's infamous statement—'the heart wants what the heart wants'—as a case study in how following desire can lead to objectively immoral outcomes. The illustration exposes the absurdity of treating desire as self-justifying when the desire itself is corrupt. The congregation's instinctive revulsion toward Allen's behavior demonstrates their implicit agreement that hearts can be warped.
- personal story · unit #21 — Alcantar narrates a childhood Sunday School memory where a boastful child claimed to feel no guilt when sinning successfully. The wise teacher reframed his success as evidence of judgment rather than approval, terrifying the child with the concept that God sometimes punishes by granting desires. The Oscar Wilde quotation provides literary weight to the same concept—getting what you want can be the judgment itself.
- cultural reference · unit #28 — Alcantar completes the Chris Hansen illustration by revealing Hansen's own moral failure—caught in an affair after years of exposing others' sins. The ironic reversal demonstrates that the impulse to diagnose others' corruption while excusing our own is universal. The illustration serves the application by showing that no one—not even the moral prosecutor—escapes the need for self-examination.
- The most fundamental human excuse—'I didn't know God existed'—is directly contradicted by Paul's assertion that all people possess clear knowledge of God. unit #4
- When humans suppress the knowledge of God, their thinking becomes futile because they must construct elaborate alternative explanations for reality while denying its foundational truth—that God made and rules all things. unit #9
- Suppressing knowledge of God warps not only human reasoning but also human desires, making the heart an unreliable guide despite contemporary culture's elevation of authentic self-expression. unit #11
- Contemporary culture has replaced Enlightenment trust in reason with trust in feelings, but Paul teaches that desires are equally corrupted by sin and therefore equally unreliable as guides. unit #12
- Contemporary culture treats religion as one isolated domain among many, but Paul argues that worship is the foundational reality beneath all reasoning and desire, making religion unavoidably comprehensive rather than compartmentalized. unit #15
- People commonly interpret God's non-intervention against their sin as evidence that He approves or that judgment isn't coming, treating His patience as permission. unit #19
- The excuse 'I can stop whenever I want' fails because sin never remains isolated—it inevitably snowballs and begets more sin, as Paul's cascading catalog in Romans 1 demonstrates. unit #24
"What a man had rather were true, he more readily believes." — Francis Bacon (unit #9)
"What is an idol? It is anything more important to you than God. Anything that absorbs your heart and imagination more than God. Anything you seek to give you what only God can give. An idol is whatever you look at and say in your heart of hearts, if I have that, then I'll feel my life has meaning. Then I'll know I have value. Then I'll feel significant and secure." — Tim Keller (unit #16)
"When the gods want to punish you, they answer your prayers." — Oscar Wilde (unit #21)
Full transcript
0 · Alcantar opens by establishing the church's commitment to sequential expository preaching and frames the upcoming passage as difficult but necessary
Amen. Well, grace and peace to you today, church. It is good to gather with the people of God and open the Word of God. So would you open your Bibles with me to the letter to the Romans, chapter 1? If you haven't put a bookmark yet, you're gonna want to have one there for the next many months in our series on Romans. Now, one of One of the things we do at our church is we particularly preach the Bible section by section, verse after verse, so that— there's a number of benefits to that, but one of the benefits of it is so that we don't skip anything that we might rather skip. This is an example of one of those passages that perhaps you'd rather not think too much about for yourself or others, but it is part of God's word. It is part of the counsel of God's word. And it is one of those distinctives that we as a church have held for many, many years. And this sermon is gonna be an example as to why we do that. And let me encourage you, if we just had a bunch of members join, maybe you're here temporarily, maybe you're looking for a church, let me encourage you, So think about that quality and that value as you look for a church. Look for a church that preaches the Bible the way that God wrote it, because God wrote it that way, so we're gonna teach it that way so that he sets the agenda and not us, so that you might be protected from the bright ideas of the guy in the pulpit and rather see a pulpit submitted to the word of God, amen?
1 · Full reading of Romans 1:18-25, establishing the text's flow from God's revealed wrath through humanity's suppression of truth to the consequent divine abandonment
So we're going to be reading Romans chapter 1, and we're going to be reading verses 18 and onward. And note that this occurs right after that thesis of the letter, the righteous shall live by faith. Look down at verse 18. This is God's word. For The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For His invisible attributes, namely His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived ever since the creation of the world in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies, among themselves because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
2 · Brief pastoral prayer asking for spiritual illumination in understanding the passage
This is God's Word. And I pray, Lord, for the preaching and the hearing of your Word, particularly today, that you would give us ears to hear and eyes to see. In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.
3 · Alcantar uses the To Catch a Predator cultural moment as an extended illustration of human excuse-making when confronted with wrongdoing
Well, in the early 2000s, Dateline NBC began a new segment that quickly caught fire in the culture. In the segment, a crew, a film crew, would rent a house, set up cameras all over it, and then host Chris Hansen would wait in one of the rooms for men to arrive. Men arrived at the house, believed that they had been chatting with young teenage girls or boys. They would show up at the house believing that they could get away with ugly and perverse crimes in secret. They came from all walks of life. One was a firefighter, one was a criminal justice instructor, one was a former teacher, one was a religious leader, one was even a prosecutor. The confrontations that ensued were, well, were fearful and terrifying. But perhaps the most terrifying part of the confrontation wasn't the sudden appearance of cameras, wasn't the sudden appearance of a Dateline NBC celebrity, wasn't anything that was necessarily threatening them in the environment. And yet men reacted by crying, by begging, by screaming, by running to one particular thing: the folder. Chris Hansen always had with him a folder of their own messages, and he would read from it. And as these men tried to make excuses, they tried to give reasons, they tried to say they didn't know what was going on, they tried to say they didn't know anybody here, it was an accident, They just wandered into the wrong house. Who knew how they got there? He would read their own words back to them, and then they would implode. Now, this caught on, the drama of it from a human moment, and the epidemic that nobody had known about of these sort of illicit crimes going on with the new internet age. And immediately there was a debate in America. And essentially the debate centered around this question: what's wrong with these people? These people are messed up. They got here somehow. How did they get there? What was it that— what was it, the entrapment? Were they manipulated into this for television? Or was it because they came from a bad background or because their family was terrible? Was it society's fault? Is society producing people like this? Was it the internet's fault? That was a newfangled thing. In many ways at the time we were getting used to? Was it a neurological imbalance? What was going on? What's wrong with people? And that question, what's wrong with people, is one of the most fundamental questions you could ask and answer as a human being. And let's be honest, the way we ask and answer it is typically, what's wrong with you people? Right? It's not usually like we're looking in the mirror going, what's wrong with me? You know, we're like, what's wrong with these people, that person, this group? These people, what's wrong with them? Right? It's usually the way we're asking it. And Paul turns the tables on us in this letter to the Romans. One of the things that you notice about Paul is, is he has just given us the very good news of verses 16 and 17. Right? The righteousness of God has been revealed and, and the righteous shall live by faith. He holds out the gift of Christ's righteousness, but then he takes an excursus. Into, of all things, the wrath of God against the unrighteous. Now, why would he do this? I want you to see the outline here. This is a bit of what is going on. We see the gift of God's righteousness, and then we see the need for righteousness, basically chapter 1:16 through 3:20. So, this next section is all about the need for righteousness. In our particular section, Paul is going to contrast the unrighteousness of the Gentiles with the unrighteousness of the Jews. So imagine these are sort of two sides of the church, the Romans and the Jewish people, and he's going to take each of them in turn and go, okay, you might think you're fine. Here's why you're unrighteous. And you might think you're fine. Here's why you're unrighteous. And get everybody to the point of saying, we all All are unrighteous. That's where he's driving. And in our text today, he's breaking it down by looking first at the Gentiles, at the Romans in the church. And he's going to lay out what's wrong, what's the unrighteousness, and then what God does in response. Now, that's the textual outline. But what I want to help you with today is apply this. Because verse 20, it gives you essentially why Paul is making this argument. He says, here's what's going on, and then he says, so they are without excuse. Paul aims to knock down our excuses, our reasons, our saying, we're really not that big of a— it's not that big of a deal. You've got things all wrong. No, no, Chris Hansen, that's not me in the transcript. That must have been somebody with my same name, right? This is— these are the things that we say And look, that's an extreme example. The To Catch a Predator phenomenon is an extreme example. But friends, don't we do the exact same thing every time we're caught in a lie or caught in adultery or caught looking on the internet at something we shouldn't or caught cutting corners at our job? We all of a sudden, excuses multiply, don't they? But they, but we, but I, but it. So what we're going to do is walk through and see 2 things. See, one, that we're not quite as righteous as we think we are, and 2, to see that the world around us really needs Jesus. That's what we're going to look at.
4 · Alcantar introduces the first excuse Paul dismantles—the claim of ignorance about God's existence
Number one, first excuse, but I didn't know. But I didn't know I wasn't supposed to do that. Now, one of the most common things I hear in the modern era is people equivocating on whether there is a God or not. I see this happen a lot in pop culture. I see this happen a lot on the street, sort of at the basic level, where people will be asked, do you think there's a God? And they'll essentially respond with the version of, maybe, maybe not. You can't prove things one way or the other, so I guess we'll never know. Right? Have you guys heard that? It's just like, well, maybe, maybe not. I don't know. And Paul takes aim at that because a lot of people would say, listen, God might be real, but he hasn't been real clear. You know, why doesn't God be clear? Why isn't he clear about where he is and who he is and what he thinks and what we should do or not do? I have to commit this crime because who can know if God doesn't want me to? I didn't know. And Paul is saying, yes, you do. You do know.
5 · Alcantar engages the apparent paradox in Romans 1:20—how can invisible attributes be clearly perceived? This sets up his sustained analogy about air's invisibility not negating its obvious existence
Look at the language here. His— verse 20— his invisible attributes, namely his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly perceived ever since the creation of the world in the things that have been made, so they are without excuse. Now, how can Paul say something invisible is clear and obvious? Right? How is that possible?
Recent preaching context
The three sermons immediately preceding this one in the preaching schedule.
About the church
Crawler & AI-search policy · view robots.txt and llms.txt
This sermon page is intentionally optimized for search engines and AI assistants. We've opted into being crawled by both. The crawler-config files at the domain root:
/robots.txt
User-agent: * Allow: / User-agent: GPTBot Allow: / User-agent: ClaudeBot Allow: / User-agent: Google-Extended Allow: / User-agent: PerplexityBot Allow: / Sitemap: https://sermonsteward.com/sitemap.xml
/llms.txt
# Cross of Grace Church A church preaching expository sermons through the books of the Bible. ## Sermons - [Who Am I? (Romans 1:1-7, 2026-09-27)](/CoGElPaso/sermons/who-am-i-2026-09-27) - [What Makes the Gospel Any Different? (Romans 1:1-15, 2026-10-04)](/CoGElPaso/sermons/what-makes-the-gospel-any-different-2026-10-04) - [How Can the Shameful be Unashamed? (Romans 1:16-17, 2026-10-18)](/CoGElPaso/sermons/how-can-the-shameful-be-unashamed-2026-10-18) - [What's Wrong With People? (Romans 1:16-32, 2026-10-25)](/CoGElPaso/sermons/what-s-wrong-with-people-2026-10-25) ## About - About the church - Plan a visit
The page itself ships with Schema.org Article + Church markup (with real geo coordinates), Open Graph + Twitter cards for share previews, and a canonical URL. Transcripts are server-rendered HTML — no JS dependency for the readable body.